DentalPPCAI SEO

When you don't control the website, you win everywhere else

Dentists at Midtown · Miami, FL · audited September 1, 2026

Dentist in scrubs and loupes reviewing a chart with a colleague

Who they are

Two-dentist practice on North Miami Avenue, in-network with Aetna, Ameritas, Anthem, Cigna, Delta Dental, Guardian, MetLife, United Healthcare and UCCI, plus the Smile Generation Dental Plan.

Live site audit · September 1, 2026

What we verified

A Pacific Dental Services / Smile Generation template site, mirrored at smilegeneration.com. Online booking, financing and membership plan pages are live; there is no blog. The practice does not independently control the domain, which caps what can be changed on-page.

Every statement above was confirmed against dentistsatmidtown.com on September 1, 2026. Sites change; this is a dated observation, not a permanent claim.

The problem

Every standard on-site playbook was off the table. The site is corporate-controlled and cannot be restructured.

This is the case where the off-site model earns its keep. 77% of AI citations on branded queries come from sources that are not the brand's own site, and 84% of AI citations trace to earned media. Google Business Profile, review architecture, third-party listings and paid search all sit outside the DSO template — and together they are the larger share of the opportunity anyway.

What made this one different

The strongest PPO panel in the Florida book. In-network status is the single highest-intent filter patients apply, and it was buried on the template.

What we did

PPC playbook

The dental ad account is rarely the problem. The phone is. Buy intent correctly, then fix the call path that loses a third of it.

  • Split campaigns by intent tier, because emergency ($75.19 CPL, 8.89% conversion), general ($84.77, 7.74%) and orthodontic ($71.52, 14.21%) demand behave nothing alike and should never share a budget.
  • Rebuilt landing pages per treatment against the 10.67% category conversion benchmark, with insurance and financing answered above the fold.
  • Then fixed the leak that costs more than the entire ad account: 30–38% of practice calls go unanswered during business hours, and 60–65% of those are new-patient calls.
  • Installed call tracking, recording and a missed-call text-back, and scored every call — call-to-appointment sits at 55% industry-wide against a 72% top decile.
  • Built a same-week appointment offer into the ads, because top-decile practices seat new patients in 4.5 days against a 25-day average and speed-to-seat is the conversion lever nobody bids on.
  • Moved reporting to cost per booked new patient against a $850–$1,300 first-year production value.

AI SEO playbook

Local health queries only return an AI Overview about 11% of the time. The AI risk to a practice is at discovery, not on the SERP — 47% of patients now research providers with AI and 36% say it changed their choice.

  • Built page depth against the questions patients actually ask, not the treatments the practice sells — symptoms and decisions, because that is what gets cited.
  • Held the Local Pack with a proper GBP rebuild: local health queries return an AI Overview only about 11% of the time against 93% for conditions and symptoms, so the money keywords are still a pack fight.
  • Ran the Scriblr citation baseline across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews on the practice's real patient-question set, tracked weekly.
  • Built review architecture as an AI input, not a vanity metric — 75% of patients refuse to book below 4.0 stars, 44% require 4.5+, and 55% have cancelled or avoided an appointment over reviews.
  • Went after third-party mentions through LinkersPro, because 77% of AI citations come from sources that are not the practice's own website and 84% trace to earned media.
  • Kept every clinical page current, since AI-cited content runs 25.7% fresher than the organic top ten.

How it was sequenced

PPC timeline

  1. Days 0–14

    Audit, conversion tracking rebuilt, negative keyword purge, campaign restructure by intent tier.

  2. Days 15–45

    Treatment landing pages shipped, call tracking and missed-call recovery in place.

  3. Days 46–90

    Budget reallocated on booked-patient data rather than lead data; same-week seating offer live.

AI SEO timeline

  1. Days 0–30

    Citation baseline across four assistants, GBP rebuild, page architecture and entity cleanup.

  2. Days 31–90

    Symptom and decision content shipped, review engine live, first off-site mention wave.

  3. Days 91–180

    Mention velocity sustained, citation rate compounds, freshness cycle running on clinical and service pages.

The numbers

Targets this programme was set and measured against

These are not reported results. Dentists at Midtown's own reporting has not yet been reconciled against these rows — see how we define a target versus a result.

MetricBaselineTargetChangeScope
Cost per lead by intent tier$111$87-22%USD, blended across intent tiers
Call-to-appointment conversion rate52.0%64.0%+12 ptspercentage of leads and calls converted
Cost per booked new patient$214$136-37%USD per acquired patient
AI assistant mention rate10%29%+19 ptsshare of the practice's patient-question prompt set naming it, across 4 assistants

Where these targets come from

Published figureWhat it measuresSource
$72.97Dental Google Ads cost per lead, $8.00 CPC, 10.67% conversion rate (13,474 US campaigns)WordStream / LocaliQ (2026)
55% / 72%Dental call-to-appointment conversion: industry average vs top decile (12.5M interactions)Patient Prism (2026)
30-38%Share of dental practice calls unanswered during business hours; 60-65% are new-patient callsDental Economics (2026)
$850-$1,300New dental patient first-year productionDental Economics (2026)
47% / 36%Patients who used AI to research providers, and who say AI influenced their final choicerater8 Patient Choice Report (2026)
11% vs 93%AI Overview coverage: local health queries vs conditions/symptoms queriesSearch Engine Land / BrightEdge (2026)
77%Share of AI citations on branded queries coming from off-page sources, not the brand's own siteOmniscient Digital (23,000+ citations) (2026)
84%Share of AI citations tracing to earned media (25M+ links, 17 industries)Muck Rack (2026)

Objections this answers

  • “We tried Google Ads and got price shoppers.”
  • “Patients find us by referral. Search doesn't matter for dentistry.”

The proof behind every figure

These are the raw exports Dentists at Midtown receives, and the ones any number on this page reconciles against. Ask any agency for the equivalent.

  • Google Ads export by campaign tier
  • Call recordings with booking outcome scored
  • Practice management new-patient export matched to source
  • Appointment lead-time report
  • Scriblr prompt-set exports, before and after
  • Local grid screenshots
  • GBP insights
  • Review dashboard
  • Mention log with live third-party URLs

Systems used

  • M.A.R.S. for call tracking, missed-call recovery and booking attribution
  • Scriblr for AI citation tracking
  • LinkersPro for earned mention acquisition

Questions about this engagement

Every standard on-site playbook was off the table. The site is corporate-controlled and cannot be restructured. This is the case where the off-site model earns its keep. 77% of AI citations on branded queries come from sources that are not the brand's own site, and 84% of AI citations trace to earned media. Google Business Profile, review architecture, third-party listings and paid search all sit outside the DSO template — and together they are the larger share of the opportunity anyway.

Related engagements

Want the same audit on your site?

We run the audit that opens every one of these engagements before any money changes hands. You get the findings whether or not you hire us.

Book a 20-minute call
CallWhatsAppBook
Chat with us